RegTech Sample Post: AML Monitoring
AI generated.
This sample models a regulated fintech that needs cross‑border AML monitoring, sanctions screening, and auditable case management. The stack balances coverage, explainability, and operational cost. Entity chips surface the key vendors and networks.
Ecosystem: swift, chainalysis, lexisnexis, thomsonreuters, refinitiv, worldcheck.
Key components
- Sanctions and PEP screening with worldcheck
- Real‑time transaction monitoring on swift
- Case management with audit trails and evidence linking
- Investigator workflows supported by lexisnexis
Metrics
- 25% fewer false positives after tuning chainalysis
- Investigation time cut in half using lexisnexis features
- Broader geographic coverage with refinitiv datasets
Vendor comparison
| Vendor | Sanctions & PEP | AML analytics | Explainability | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| worldcheck | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | Global |
| chainalysis | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | Crypto‑heavy |
| lexisnexis | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | Global |
| refinitiv | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Global |
Reporting & storage
| Entity | Dashboards | Audit exports | Long‑term storage |
|---|---|---|---|
| powerbi | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| tableau | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| snowflake | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Operations checklist
- Weekly list updates from worldcheck
- Alert triage KPIs tracked in powerbi
- Audit exports archived in snowflake
- Model feedback loop summarized in tableau
For reporting: powerbi, tableau. For storage: PostgreSQL, snowflake.
Sample entity chips: Chainalysis,
SWIFT.